Full index of posts »
StockTalks
-
Here comes Pandora $P. Are you ready? http://seekingalpha.com/a/5uzz
Jun 14, 2011
-
"No surprises" quarterly report from CIDM. Adjusting the model a bit. IV still around $6. Note to follow. $CIDM
Jun 9, 2011
-
Photonics are really seeing some momentum. Good for $NPTN and $TINY which we follow. IPG had a blowout quarter yesterday too.
Feb 11, 2011
Latest Comments
-
boisterousbob on Can iGo Keep Going? This is very curious, as I had idly believed th...
Most Commented
- Can iGo Keep Going? (1 Comment)
Posts by Themes
3D Cinema,
3D technology,
Connected Consumer,
dividend-ideas,
Earnings Yield,
Economy,
Energy,
GroupOn,
Internet,
IPO,
ipo-analysis,
long-ideas,
Markets,
Mobile,
mobile,
Nanotechnology,
NFLX,
NPTN,
Online Marketing Services,
Pandora,
RLD,
Security,
Smartphones,
Software,
Solazyme,
Strategy,
SZYM,
Technology,
Video,
ZAGG
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.














View Research 2.0's Instablogs on:
Email Service Provider SMTP reports 70% revenue growth with 50% operating margins
· Revenue growth at this “micro multi-national” continues to accelerate with 70% growth. Quarterly revenues are now just over $1.1M. Operating margins are a stunning 50%.
· The company is poised to exceed our estimates for the full year 2011 and push us to increase estimates and our intrinsic valuation estimate.
· Ironically if SMTP were a private company it would be trading at a much higher valuation on private share exchanges like SecondMarket and SharesPost. VC funded startups in this space are getting funded at higher valuations and are years away for profitability.
· In addition to strong operating results SMTP has acquired 4,000 IP addresses that are the foundation of successful email delivery. This will allow them to support thousands of new customers.
· Social marketing and behavioral commerce trends led by companies like GroupOn and Livingsocial are adding to the already high demand for reliable email delivery services. Although message volumes are also expanding, email remains the single best common denominator for basic communication.
· We continue to see this market evolve in a similar fashion as the content delivery space and expect that over time most internet infrastructure service providers (like Amazon and Rackspace) will want to add email delivery networks to their services.
· Investors looking for a rapidly growing, highly profitable micro-capitalization internet infrastructure service provider should take a close look at SMTP.
· The company recently completed a “direct to market” IPO process and is just now accessible to pubic investors. Our intrinsic valuation (IV) remains $3 per share.
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.
Email Delivery Networks: An emerging cloud investment.
Sending email has become a major industry problem thanks to both the massive growth of legitimate sending mixed with an enormous amount of SPAM. Much as it is in online security, there is no one “silver bullet” to efficiently and effectively deliver large amounts of email.

For small organizations the typical answer has been one of the many email marketing service providers. This includes companies like Constant Contact (NASDAQ:CTCT), MailChimp, VerticalResponse, ExactTarget, and many others. Most relationship management solutions like Salesforce (NYSE: CRM), Responsys (NASDAQ: MKTG) andUnica (acquired by IBM) include email services as part of their solution.
Large organizations don’t need or want the content creation and management features of these marketing tools and they need to send far more email than these solutions are built to handle.Large-scale applications require a “sending platform” to deliver the emails, which can reach into the millions.
There’s also a big difference between internal company email and external consumer email. Thanks to new rules and regulations, many types of emails have become legal documents. There’s now a significant compliance burden on company email for retention, discovery, content management, etc. Large external email distributions simply don’t belong in this environment and are better handled externally with a service provider.
Sending large volumes of emails effectively requires infrastructure, technology, tools and expertise. To make it even more challenging, SPAM has become such an issue that large senders of email are viewed as “guilty until proven innocent” which means their sent email may never reach the intended destination. Senders must develop an online infrastructure reputation.
These dynamics favor specialty cloud infrastructure service providers like SMTP (OTC: SMTP). Over time we expect this market to evolve in a similar fashion to content delivery networks and financial market technology. Institutions use purpose-built online infrastructure for services like video asset management, funds transfer, stock trading and transaction processing.
The size of the email market in general and the slice for SMTP in particular is not well-documented. The largest segment of the market is internal email, which is estimated to cost about $20 to $25/month in the enterprise. If outsourced to Google this cost can drop to about $8/month but companies give up considerable flexibility and integration by doing so.
These high costs are forcing companies to move their high volume emails to clients, customers and prospects outside of their internal systems. In addition, there are large organizations without substantial internal infrastructure (like non-profits) that want to reach millions, tens of millions and in some cases hundreds of millions of email subscribers. Estimates for external e
mail volumes are notoriously flawed due to the high percentage of SPAM in the raw numbers. However, many would agree that the figure is “around” 300 billion email messages sent per day with about 3 billion email accounts. The line between SPAM and that subtle opt-in when someone checks the “I want to receive updates from American Airlines” box is a blurry one.
The fact is that almost every successful consumer-focused organization is likely to need this service. This is as true for the Catholic Church as is for Groupon, Patron Tequila, Budweiser, American Airlines, or Coca Cola. One fairly simple back-of-the-envelope way to get at the size of the market opportunity for SMTP and other high end email outsourcing companies is to base it on volumes. We’ll assume that just 1% of the daily volume is bona fide consumer marketing email sent to large lists by big organizations. That’s 90 billion messages per month to parse into potential revenue. We used a typical power law distribution of customer email volumes to segment the market and determine how many customers are in each segment. Then it’s a matter of applying the normal pricing to come up with the current market size of just over $500M per year.
The Highlights of the Full SMTP Report (link below):
The full research report is available here: SMTP Coverage Report May 3 2011 and contains more information regarding the company, the market, competition and valuation.
[Disclosure: SMTP, Inc. is a corporate research advisory client. Please see the disclosure information in the research report and on our website for more information.]
Additional disclosure: We have performed and received compensation for advisory services provided to the company.
Harris & Harris and the Nanotech Renaissance
We initiated coverage of Harris & Harris (NASDAQ: TINY – $5.17) in January and published another update yesterday. The recent IPO of NeoPhotonics (NASDAQ: NPTN – $10.59) and acquisition of BioVex for around $1B were certainly positive developments. But things have continued to get better. In fact we see a growing number of companies across an expanding set of industries that are enjoying commercial success with nanotechnology. And when I say that I mean impressive revenue growth, profitability and reaching a scale of operation that will allow some (like Solazyme) to become public companies and others to become desirable and substantive acquisition targets. The improved environment for “liquidity” directly benefits the Harris & Harris business and investment model.
The highlights of our Harris & Harris Coverage Update Report April 28 2011 are provided below and include more background on several Harris & Harris portfolio companies. The report also takes a deeper dive into Metabolon in the molecular diagnostics space and Laser Light Engines which represents a key part of what will be the next generation of digital projectors and entertainment. As described in our original report Harris & Harris has a diverse portfolio of outstanding companies in these and other nanotechnology-focused innovation areas. We believe the current NAV of the portfolio understates the value of the assets and that the company deserves a premium to NAV which it will earn over time. Our intrinsic value estimate (IV) remains $12.
Highlights
We encourage investors to read the full update report and also to refer back to our original initiation of coverage document for additional background. Visit the research section of our website for that.
[Disclosure: Harris & Harris is a corporate research client of Research 2.0. We receive compensation in exchange for advisory services and to provide on-going independent research coverage. We adhere to our own research process, exercise full editorial control of all published content and apply the same standards to Harris & Harris as we do to all companies we follow. Research 2.0 employees are governed by rules to ensure that our interests and actions are aligned with those of our clients and institutional investors. For additional information about our sponsored research program, please visit our sponsored coverage page on the website. For additional information about Research 2.0 disclaimers, disclosures and employee policies please visit our legal page.]